🔗 Share this article

Only 48 hours prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – not just the winner citywide, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of local celebrity recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while missing the independent candidate’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to another area to a third locale, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

What was your night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally every few minutes! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by a dozen percentage points, but there were large groups of ballots that came in later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, there was a world in which election day went kind of poorly for him, in which Cuomo was going to end up essentially doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani gain those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He gained considerably with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

Additionally, there were a number of supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Voters in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump last year went for the progressive this year. But it’s not that he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could go over two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently you would say he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so afterwards none can claim the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an 88% Trump area. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island who had a high participation. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your often-discussed left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view there was some weakening of the progressive zone in certain places like neighborhoods that have more older white ethnic folks. There, for example, the property owners and residents supported the independent. Thus there existed some opposition. But no, mostly the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the vote there was coverage on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel was influential there. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Queens neighborhoods, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s not accidental that key figures from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see additional examples – candidates will emerge from these neighborhoods to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that every city in America can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.